Volume List  / Volume 8 (4)



DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(4).09

8 / 4 / 513 - 527 Pages


Muhammad Ashraf Javid - Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nizwa, Initial Campus at Birkat-al-Mouz, 616, Nizwa, Oman -

Saddam Hussain - Department of Transportation Engineering and Management, University of Engineering and Technology, 54890, G.T. Road, Lahore, Pakistan -

Muhammad Farhan Anwaar - Department of Transportation Engineering and Management, University of Engineering and Technology, 54890, G.T. Road, Lahore, Pakistan -


The quality of public transportation modes plays significant role in the mobility of people. Their competitiveness with private transport in terms of service quality and performance is very important in making modal shift. People often tend to own and use private vehicle when they have negative perceptions regarding public transportation. Therefore, this study aims to make comparative assessment of attitudinal dimensions of wagon as public transport mode and motorcycle as private mode considering the perceptions of the people with the help of a questionnaire survey. This survey was conducted in Lahore city at suitable locations and 320 samples were collected. Analysis of results revealed that people possess negative attitudes towards wagon service whereas their attitudes are strongly positive with most of the dimensions of motorcycle. Factor analyses resulted in three latent variables both for motorcycle and wagon mode. The common factors include instrumental and service dimensions whereas specific factors are user’s friendly dimensions and cost and safety dimensions for motorcycle and wagon, respectively. Mode priority selection and wagon specific attitudes are significant factors in determining the people’s preference to use wagon service under different scenarios. People’s positive attitudes on motorcycle dimensions have significant relationship with people tendency to use wagon service. These findings demand valuable improvements in the service quality of wagon service considering the perceptions of the local citizens.

Download Article

Number of downloads: 787


This research was conducted at University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan. Authors are thankful to those who helped in this study especially in conducting the survey.


Beirao, G.; Cabral, J.A.S. 2007. Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A Qualitative Study, Transport Policy 14(6): 478-489.


Borhan, M.; Ibrahim, A.N.H.; Syamsunur, D.; Rahmat, R.A. 2017. Why Public Bus is a Less Attractive Mode of Transport: A Case Study of Putrajaya, Malaysia, Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Article in Press.


Farag, S.; Lyons, G. 2010. Explaining public transport information use when a car is available: attitude theory empirically investigated, Transportation 37(6): 897-913.


Golob, T.F. 2003. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(1): 1-25.


Govender, K.K. 2016. Exploring public transport service quality: the case of mini-bus taxi service in South Africa, Eurasian Business Review 6(1): 101-116.


Habib, K.M.N.; Kattan, L.; Islam, M.T. 2011. Model of personal attitudes towards transit service quality, Journal of Advanced Transportation 45(4): 271–285.


Hu, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, W. 2015. Impact of perceptions of bus service performance on mode choice preference, Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7(3): 1-11.


Ibrahim, M.F. 2003. Car ownership and attitudes towards transport modes for shopping purposes in Singapore, Transportation 30(4): 435-457.


Imaz, A.; Habib, k.M.N.; Shalaby, A.; Idris, A.O. 2015. Investigating the factors affecting transit user loyalty, Public Transport 7(1): 39-60.


Javid, M.A. 2017. Intentions of Car and Motorcycle Oriented Groups towards Public Transport in Lahore, Technical Journal, UET Taxila 22(2): 9-16.


Javid, M.A.; Okamura, T.; Nakamura, F.; Wang, R. 2012. A Study on Commuter’s Preferences and Satisfaction with urban public transportation: A case of Para-transit service in Lahore, Pakistan, Journal of International City Planning, CPIJ, 225-235.


Javid, M.A.; Okamura, T.; Nakamura, F.; Tanaka, S.; Wang, R. 2016. People's Behavioral Intentions towards Public Transport in Lahore: Role of Situational Constraints, Mobility Restrictions and Incentives, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20(1): 401-410.


JICA. 2012. JICA: Lahore Urban Transport Master Plan in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Final Report, Vol. I & II.


Joewono, T.B.; Kubota, H. 2007. Exploring Public Perception of Paratransit Service Using Binomial Logistic Regression, Civil Engineering Dimension 9(1): 1-8.


Mehbub, A.A. 2009. Paradox between public transport and private car as a modal choice in policy formulation, Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners 2: 71-77.


Okamura, T.; Kaneko, Y.; Nakamura, F.; Wang, R. 2013. Passenger’s Attitudes to the Service Items of Jeepneys in Metro Manila by Different Lifestyles, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 10: 1384-1395.


Rahman, F.; Das, T.; Hadiuzzaman, M.; Hossain, S. 2016. Perceived service quality of paratransit in developing countries: A structural equation approach, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice 93: 23-38.


Rahman, F.; Haque, M.F.; Ehsan, M.T.; Rahman, S.M.; Hadiuzzaman, M. 2017. Determination of Users’ Perception of Paratransit Service Quality in Dhaka City Based on Users Perception, International Journal of Education and applied research 7(1): 19-24.


Shimazaki, T.; Rahman, M. 1996. Physical Characteristics of Paratransit in Developing Countries of Asia, Journal of Advanced Transportation 30(2): 5-24.


Tangphaisankun, A.; Okamura, T.; Nakamura, F.; Wang, R. 2010. A Study in Integrating Paratransit as a Feeder System into Urban Transportation and Its Effects on Mode Choice Behavior: A Study in Bangkok, Thailand. In Proceedings of the 12th WCTR, 22 p.


Wright, L.; Fjellstrom, K. 2003. Sustainable Transport: A Source Book for policy makers in developing cities: Module 3a: Mass Transit Options. Available from internet: https://www.itdp.org.