Volume List  / Volume 9 (4)



DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2019.9(4).07

9 / 4 / 419 - 430 Pages


Krishnapriya Molath Gopi - Department of Civil Engineering, Mar Athanasius College of Engineering, Kerala, India -

Soosan George Tanenlimalil - Department of Civil Engineering, Saintgits College of Engineering, Kerala, India -

Bybin Paul - Department of Civil Engineering, Mar Athanasius College of Engineering, Kerala, India -


Efficient transportation system management is possible only through managing travel needs of commuters, using travel demand models. The extend by which a commuter need to travel for accomplishing his/her daily needs is here represented by the total travel time. Total travel time is one of the activity-travel behaviour which is least considered by transportation researchers. Travel demand studies often focus the workers, but give little attention to the students. In a developing country like India, students also contribute a major share in morning and evening peak hour traffic. This study presents the analysis of total travel time for the student community incorporating the socio-demographic features using activity based modelling approach. Preliminary analysis gives details on daily activity-travel pattern, mode choice preferences and other particulars of students in the study area. Statistical models are developed and simulation of choice probabilities is also done for understanding the factors affecting total travel time behaviour, for students in a usual working day.

Download Article

Number of downloads: 592


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received for the research from Woman Scientist Division, Kerala State Council for Science, Technology & Environment (KSCSTE), Government of Kerala, India.


Ashalatha, R.; Manju, V.S.; Zacharia, A. B. 2013. Mode Choice Behavior of Commuters in Thiruvananthapuram City, Journal of Transportation Engineering 139(5): 494-502. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000533.


Chapin, F.S. 1974. Human activity patterns in the city: Things people do in time and in space, Wiley-Interscience 13.


Cullen, I.; Godson, V. 1975. Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns, Progress in planning 4: 1-96.


Frank, L.; Bradley, M.; Kavage, S.; Chapman, J.; Lawton, T.K. 2008. Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice, Transportation 35(1): 37-54. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6.


Gopi, K.M.; Thanelimalil, S.G.; Anjaneyulu, M.V.L.R. 2018. Travel Survey Instrument Design Integrating Residential location Characteristics and Survey Administration for Kochi City, India, International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 8(2): 198-212.


Greene, W.H. 2016. NLOGIT Version 6.0, Reference Guide. Econometric Software, Inc.


Hägerstrand, T. 1970. What about people in Regional Science?, Papers in regional science 24(1): 6-21.


Hensher, D.A.; Rose, J.M.; Greene, W.H. 2005. Applied choice analysis a primer. Cambridge university press, New York.


Khattak, A.; Wang, X.; Son, S.; Agnello, P. 2011. Travel by university students in Virginia: Is this travel different from travel by the general population?, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2255: 137-145. doi: 10.3141/2255-16.


Koppelman, F.S.; Bhat, C. 2006. A self-instructing course in mode choice modeling: multinomial and nested logit models. U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration, USA.


Lomax, T.; Schrank, D. 2010. Developing a Total Travel Time Performance Measure A Concept Paper. Texas Transportation Institute, USA.


Manoj, M.; Verma, A. 2015. Activity-travel behaviour of non-workers from Bangalore City in India, Transportation Research Part A 78: 400-424. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.6.006.


Mitra, R.; Buliung, R.N. 2014. The influence of neighborhood environment and household travel interactions on school travel behavior: an exploration using geographically-weighted models, Journal of Transport Geography 36: 69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.trangeo.2014.03.002.


Müller, S.; Tscharaktschiew, S.; Haase, K. 2008. Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas, Journal of Transport Geography 16(5): 342-357. doi: 10.1016/j.trangeo.2007.12.004.


Parthan, K.; Srinivasan, K.K. 2013. Investigation of Alternate Behavioural Frameworks for Mode Choice Decisions of Workers in Chennai City, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 104: 573-582. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.151.


Salonen, M.; Toivonen, T. 2013. Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport, Journal of Transport Geography 31: 143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.011.


Smart city challenge Stage 2, Smart city proposal. 2016. Ministry of Urban development, Government of India.


Sreela, P.K.; Anjaneyulu, M.V.L.R. 2018. Modelling the activity travel pattern of commuters in a medium sized city in India, International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering 8(4): 481 – 493. doi: 10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(4).07.


Van Exel, N.J.A.; Rietveld, P. 2010. Perceptions of public transport travel time and their effect on choice-sets among car drivers, Journal of Transport and Land Use 2(3/4): 75-86.


Whalen, K.E.; Páez, A.; Carrasco, J. A. 2013. Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel, Journal of Transport Geography 31: 132-142. doi: 10.1016/j.trangeo.2013.06.008.