Volume List  / Volume 9 (3)



DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2019.9(3).03

9 / 3 / 290-298 Pages


Snežana Tadić - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Serbia -

Mladen Krstić - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Serbia -

Slobodan Zečević - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Serbia -


Growing competition in the global market imposes the need for proper planning of logistics processes and development of logistics networks, where logistics centers (LCs) as nodes in these network play a key role. LCs can have different structures defined by various elements characteristics, and accordingly different efficiencies. In order to identify those that would represent benchmarks for other LCs it is necessary to define the broadest set of possible structures. However, in practice a number of structures is limited, which doesn't mean there might not be some which would be competitive or more efficient than the existing ones. Therefore the goal of this paper is the modeling of potential LC structures, based on the identified dependencies between the elements characteristics and the existing structures' efficiencies. The model is tested in a case study of modeling a potential intermodal terminal structure as one of the possible LC forms.

Download Article

Number of downloads: 194


Bergqvist, R.; Falkemark, G.; Woxenius, J. 2010. Establishing intermodal terminals, World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 3(3): 285–302.


Bichou, K.; Gray, R. 2005. A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports, Transportation Research Part A 39: 75–92.


Blonigen, B. A.; Wilson, W. W. 2008. Port Efficiency and Trade Flows, Review of International Economics 16(1): 21–36.


Cullinane, K. P. B.; Wang, T. F. 2006. The efficiency of European container ports: a cross-sectional data envelopment analysis, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 9(1): 19–31.


Ding, Z. Y.; Jo, G. S.; Wang, Y.; Yeo, G. T. 2015. The Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals in Small and Medium-Sized Ports in China, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 31(2): 231–251.


EasyFit. 2019. MathWave Technologies. Available from Internet: http://www.mathwave.com/ easyfit-distribution-fitting.html.


Heljedal, M. 2013. Factors Influencing the Choice between Road and Multimodal Transportation. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Thesis No. 1635, Licentiate Thesis, Department of Science and Technology Linköping University, Sweden.


Krstić, M.; Tadić, S.; Zečević, S. 2019. Elements for defining the intermodal terminals structure. In Proceedings of the 4th Logistics international conference, LOGIC 2019, Faculty of transport and traffic engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, 2019, 206-215.


Ming-Bao, P.; Guo-Guang, H.; Ling, X. 2007. Optimal Number and Sites of Regional Logistics Centers by Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy C-mean Clustering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, 1-5.


Peng, Z.Y., Zhong, D.Y. 2008. Optimization Model for Integrated Logistics Network Design in Green Manufacturing System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 138-141.


RimienÄ—, K.; Grundey, D. 2007. Logistics Centre Concept through Evolution and Definition, Engineering economics 54(4): 87-95.


Roso, V. 2008. Factors influencing implementation of a dry port, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38(10): 782-798.


Serebrisky, T.; Sarriera, J. M.; Suárez-Alemán, A.; Araya, G.; Briceño-Garmendía, C.; Schwartz, J. 2016. Exploring the drivers of port efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean, Transport Policy 45: 31–45.


Tadić, S.; Krstić, M.; Brnjac, N. 2019. Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals, Journal of Transport Geography 78: 170–180.


Tadić, S.; Brnjac, N.; Zečević, S. 2018. Problems of choosing a dry port location. In Proceedings of the international symposium “Traffic strategic development in South East Europe”, 30-31.05.2018., Budva, Montenegro, 221-227.


Tadić, S.; Zečević, S.; Krstić, M. 2016. Locating city logistics terminal by applying the combined QFD-VIKOR method. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering, ICTTE, Belgrade, Serbia, 367-374.


Tadić, S.; Zečević, S.; Krstić, M. 2013. Locating City logistics terminal using fuzzy AHP analysis: Case of Belgrade (in Serbian), Tehnika 68(4): 707-716.


Tadić, S.; Zečević, S.; Krstić, M. 2012. City logistics terminal location selection using combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st International conference on traffic and transport engineering, ICTTE, Belgrade, Serbia, 345-358.


UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). 2009 Illustrated glossary for transport statistics. Available from Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ documents/3859598/5911341/KS-RA-10-028-EN.PDF/6ddd731e-0936-455a-be6b-eac624a83db4.


Wang, T. F.; Song, D. W.; Cullinane, K. 2003. Container Port Production Efficiency: A Comparative Study of DEA and FDH Approaches, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5: 698-713.


Wiegmansa, B.; Witte, P. 2017. Efficiency of inland waterway container terminals: Stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis to analyze the capacity design- and throughput efficiency, Transportation Research Part A 106: 12–21.


Zečević, S. 2006. Freight terminals and freight villages (in Serbian). Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. 286 p.


Zečević, S.; Tadić, S.; Krstić, M. 2017. Intermodal transport terminal location selection using a novel hybrid MCDM model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 25(6): 853−876.