Volume List  / Volume 6 (1)



DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2016.6(1).06

6 / 1 / 63-76 Pages


Manjula Madhuwanthi - Department of Information Science and Control Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering - Doctoral Program, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2137, Japan -

Ashuboda Marasinghe - Department of Information Science and Control Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering - Doctoral Program, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2137, Japan -

Shusaku Nomura - Department of Information Science and Control Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering - Doctoral Program, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2137, Japan -


This study examines a model to evaluate the probability of choosing the mode of public transport with finding most significant aspects related to the characteristic of the journey, characteristic of the traveler and the personal behavior of the traveler. The study area was focused on eleven Divisional Secretariat Divisions of the Colombo Metropolitan Area in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. This area has the most economically advanced functions as the commercial capital of Sri Lanka. The current transportation sector in the focusing area has impact of increasing vehicle ownership and serious inadequacies in the road network such as traffic congestions, shortfall of road capacity and low speed level on road. Hence this study attempts to encourage people for the public transport by focusing about their perception related to the mode choice as a solution for the above issues. The results showed that “Number of Earning Members”, “Vehicle Ownership”, ”Education”, “Age”, “Gender”, “Occupation”, “Trip Distance.”, “Trip Time”, “Total Cost” and “Safety” of the mode were the most significant factors for affecting to choose the public transport. The obtained logistic model with the significant variables had the 78.4% of accuracy for the prediction of probability in using public transport.

Download Article

Number of downloads: 759


Annan, J.; Mensah, J.; Boso, N. 2015. Traffic congestion Impact on Energy Consumption and Workforce Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Developing Country, Archives of Business Research, 3(4): 40-54.


Charles, E. 2014. Maximum likelihood, logistic regression, and stochastic gradient training. Available from Internet: http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~elkan/250B/logreg.pdf.


Cramer, D. 2003. Advanced Quantitative Data Analysis. England. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. USA. 122 p.


Dill, J.; Wardell, E. 1994. Factors affecting worksite mode choice findings from Portland, Oregon, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 51-57.


Fullerton, T.M., Jr; Walke, A.G. 2012. Border Zone Mass Transit Demand in Brownsville and Laredo, Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 51(2): 43-59.


Hiyal, B. 2013. Income disparity rising in Sri Lanka. Available from Internet: http://www.ceylontoday.lk/22-47092-news-detail-income-disparity-rising-in-sri-lanka.html.


Jaiswal, A.A.; Sharma, A. 2012. Optimization of Public Transport Demand: A Case Study of Bhopal, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(7): 1-16.


Japan International Cooperation Agency - JICA. 2014. CoMTrans Urban Transport Master Plan, Final Report - Japan International Copperation Agency. Japan. Available from Internet: http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/2011/10/DRC-transport-campaign-research-report-October-2006.pdf.


Jolly, D.; Priestley, M.; Matthews, B. 2006. Secondary analysis of existing data on disabled people’s use and experiences of public transport in Great Britain, Research Report, University of Leeds.


Kumarage, A.S. 2002. Criterion for a fares policy and fares index for bus transport in Sri Lanka, International Journal of Regulation and Governance, 2(1): 53-73.


Lalitha, K.; Ruther, G.K. 2014. Road Traffic Accident, International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 2(3): 83-86.


Madhuwanthi, R.A.M.; Marasignhe, A.; Janaka, P.C.; Asanka, D.D. 2015. A recommendation mechanism for the adaptation of the Activity Based Travel Demand Model. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Affective Science and Engineering (ISASE), F2-3.


Mohammed, A.A.; Shakir, A.A. 2013. Factors that affect transport mode preference for graduate students in the national university of Malaysia by Logit Method, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 8(3): 351-363.


Mohanty, M.; Gupta, A. 2015. Factors affecting road crash modeling, Journal of Transport Literature, 9(2): 15-19.


Niels, V.O. 2011. Service Reliability and Urban Public Transport Design, Thesis - TRAIL Thesis Series, TRAIL Research School, Netherland.


Ortuzar, J.D.; Willumsen, L.G. 1994. Modeling Transport. John Wiley & Sons ltd. USA. 207 p.


Rasario, M. 2011. Managing urban mobility system. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK. 260 p.


Rundmo, T.; Nordfjærn, T.; Iversen, H.H.; Oltedal, S.; Jørgensen, S.H. 2011. The role of risk perception and other risk related judgements in transportation mode use, Safety Science, 49(2): 226-235.


Sevanatha Urban Resource Center. 2002. Sri Lanka country report – Partnership to improve access and quality of public transport – case study Colombo, Sri Lanka. WEDC, Loughborough University, UK.


Su, F.; Schmöcker, J-D.; Bell, M.G.H. 2009. Mode Choice of Older People Before and After Shopping, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2(1): 29-46.


Subbarao, S.S.V.; Krishna Rao, K.V. 2013. Analysis of Household activity and travel behavior: A case of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(1): 98-109.


Sunday Times. 2001. The article – Killer Roads. Available from Internet: http://www.sundaytimes.lk/040606/plus/1.html.


Williams, R. 2015. Logistic Regression, Part III: Hypothesis Testing, Comparisons to OLS. Available from Internet: https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l83.pdf.


Zhan, G. 2008. Transfers and path choice in urban public transport systems, Thesis - Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Zhang, W.; Yue, W.L. 2001. Alternative solutions for urban traffic congestion. In Proceedings of the 3rd Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 327-342.