The goal of IJTTE is to broaden the knowledge of traffic and transport experts and academicians by promoting free access and provide valuable insight to transport related information, research and ideas. IJTTE will serve as a great resource for researchers and students across the globe.
Volume List  / Volume 4 (1)

Article

PEDESTRIAN RISK AT THE SIGNALIZED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING EQUIPPED WITH COUNTDOWN DISPLAY

DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2014.4(1).04


4 / 1 / 52-61 Pages

Author(s)

Milan Vujanić - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia -

Dalibor Pešić - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia -

Boris Antić - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia -

Emir Smailović - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia -


Abstract

In this paper we proposed method for assessing pedestrian risk at the signalized pedestrian crossing equipped with counter. Results showed that 17.5% of pedestrians were at high risk and male pedestrians are more often in dangerous situation (20.4%) than female pedestrians (14.4%). About 3% of all examined pedestrians created conflict situations, more frequently in first 5 seconds and last 5 seconds of red light phase (79.7% of all offenders), but the risk that pedestrians will create a conflict situation were higher in other time of red light phase. Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings equipped with countdown display could point to potentially safety problems for pedestrians and those analysis could give direction for proposing and implementing adequate countermeasures. Also, numerically defined pedestrian accident risk could assess road safety level for pedestrians and show accident occurrence probability.


Download Article

Number of downloads: 3111

Keywords:
pedestrian risk; signalized intersection; crosswalk; countdown display;


References:

Allsbrook, L.E. 1999. Pedestrian Signal Countdown Device, ITE Journal, Enhancing Transportation Safety in the 21st Century, ITE International Conference, Florida, Held: 28-31 March 1999, Washington DC, USA. 69(3): 15 p.

 

Antić, B.; Vujanić, M.; Lipovac, K.; Pešić, D. 2011. Estimation of the traffic accidents costs in Serbia by using dominant costs model, Transport. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2011.635425, 26(4): 433-440.

 

Baass, K.G. 1989. Review of European and North American practice of pedestrian signal timing. Prepared for RTAC Annual Conference Calgary, Alberta, September 17-21.

 

Díaz, E.M. 2002. Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians` intentions to violate traffic regulations, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00015-3, 5(3): 169-175.

 

Druilhe, M.; Khoudour, L. 1987. Pietons: une si longue attente. Association pour le Dèveloppement des Techniques de Transport et d`Environnement et de Circulation, TEC No. 84/85, 36-40.

 

Eccles, K.A.; Tao, R.; Mangum, B.C. 2004. Evaluation of Pedestrian Countdown Signals in Montgomery County, Maryland. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., USA.

 

Guo, H.; Gao, Z.; Yang, X.; Jiang, X. 2011. Modeling Pedestrian Violation Behavior at Signalized Crosswalks in China: A Hazards-Based Duration Approach, Traffic Injury Prevention. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2010.518652, 12(1): 96-103.

 

Huang, H.; Zeeger, C. 2000. The Effects of Pedestrian Countdown Signals in Lake Buena Vista. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center for Florida Department of Transportation, November.

 

Keegan, O.; O’Mahony, M. 2003. Modifying Pedestrian Behavior, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00061-2, 37(10): 889-901.

 

Lipovac, K.; Vujanić, M.; Marić, B.; Nešić, M. 2013. Pedestrians’ Behavior at Signalized Pedestrian Crossings, Journal of Transportation Engineering. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000491, 139(2): 165-172.

 

Markowitz, F.; Sciortino, S.; Lucero, J.F.; Bond, Y.M. 2006. Pedestrian Countdown Signals: Experience with an Extensive Pilot Installation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE Journal, 76(1): 43-48.

 

Martin, A. 2006. Factors Influencing Pedestrian Safety: A Literature Review. TRL Limited PPR 241, London.

 

Pešić, D.; Vujanić, M.; Lipovac, K.; Antić, B. 2012. An integrated method of identifying and ranking danger spots for pedestrians on microlocation, Transport. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2012.664826, 27(1): 49-59.

 

Rosenbloom, T. 2009. Crossing at a red light: Behavior of individuals and groups, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.05.002, 12(5): 389-394.

 

Singer, J.P.; Lerner, N.D. 2005. Countdown Pedestrian Signals: A Comparison of Alternative Pedestrian Change Interval Displays. Final Report, Federal Highway Administration, Rockville.

 

Vujanić, M.; Lipovac, K.; Jovanović, D.; Pešić, D.; Antić, B. 2013. ‘’Bottom-up’’ and ‘’top-down’’ approach for defining road safety strategy - case study: city of Belgrade, International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2013.3(2).07, 3(2): 185-203.

 

World Health Organization. 2009. Global status report on road safety: time for action. World Health Organization, Geneva.


Quoted IJTTE Works

”BOTTOM-UP” AND ”TOP-DOWN” APPROACH FOR DEFINING ROAD SAFETY STRATEGY - CASE STUDY: CITY OF BELGRADE



Related Keywords

METHODS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE INDICATION MEASURES AT AMAKOM INTERSECTION AND THEIR APPLICATION IN MICRO SIMULATION MODELING

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SPEED: THE CASE OF MALAYSIA