Volume List  / Volume 8 (2)

Article

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL FOR NON-LANE BASED VEHICLE MOVEMENTS

DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(2).09


8 / 2 / 249-260 Pages

Author(s)

Sadguna Nuli - Department of Civil Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Mangalpalli, Vastu Nagar, Hyderabad - 501510, Telangana, India -

Saladi Sri Venkata Subbarao - School of Engineering Sciences, Mahindra Ecole Centrale, Bahadurpally, Hyderabad – 500043, Telangana, India -


Abstract

State-of-the-art adaptive signal control models, commonly used in developed countries, uses upstream or advance detector information for determining control plan. These models work well in lane-based traffic conditions especially when multiple junctions are involved. However, traffic in many cities across the world is heterogeneous, characterised by non-lane based movement and mixed-vehicle type, which causes inaccurate estimation of turning proportions. These difficulties can be addressed to a great extent by placing the detector at the stop-line rather than in advance or upstream location. However, there is no truly adaptive traffic control models exists for such traffic conditions and sensor location. In this study, a signal control model is proposed that is truly adaptive and uses stop-line detector information. The model aims at real-time allocation of green times through actor-critic reinforcement learning; an approach originated from the machine learning community. This approach can learn relationships between signal control actions and their effect on the traffic system while determining optimal control policy. To test the performance of the model a typical four-way four phase intersection with variable flow was simulated using a traffic micro simulator (VISSIM) and interfaced with the proposed model. The performance of the model was compared with the traditional vehicle actuated system. The results using this approach shows significant improvement over traditional control, especially for varying traffic demand.


Download Article

Number of downloads: 241


Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, India for their support in carrying out the experiments.


References:

Abdulhai, B.; Pringle, R.; Karakoulas, G.J. 2003. Reinforcement learning for true adaptive traffic signal control, Journal of Transportation Engineering 129(3): 278-285.

 

Asaithambi, G.; Shravani, G. 2017. Overtaking behaviour of vehicles on undivided roads in non-lane based mixed traffic conditions, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 4(3): 252-261.

 

Bhuyan, P.K.; Rao, K.V. 2011. Application of GPS and clustering techniques in defining LOS criteria of signalized intersections for Indian cities, Highway Research Journal 4(1): 69-75.

 

Bingham, E. 2001. Reinforcement learning in neurofuzzy traffic signal control, European Journal of Operational Research 131(2): 232-241.

 

Chou, C.H.; Teng, J.C. 2002. A fuzzy logic controller for traffic junction signals, Information Sciences 143(1): 73-97.

 

El-Tantawy, S.; Abdulhai, B. 2010. An agent-based learning towards decentralized and coordinated traffic signal control. In Proceedings of the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 665-670.

 

FHWA. 2016. Traffic signal timing manual, Fedaral highway administration. Available from internet: http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov.

 

Gartner, N.H. 1983. Opac: a demand-responsive strategy for traffic signal control, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 906: 75-81.

 

Hu, Y.; Thomas, P.; Stonier, R.J. 2007. Traffic signal control using fuzzy logic and evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1785-1792.

 

Lin, F.B. 1988. Comparative analysis of two logics for adaptive control of isolated intersections, Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board 1194: 6-14.

 

Mathew, T.V.; Radhakrishnan, P. 2010. Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections, Journal of Urban Planning and Development 136(1): 59-66.

 

Mirchandani, P.; Head, L. 2001. A real-time traffic signal control system: architecture, algorithms, and analysis, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 9(6): 415-432.

 

Owen, L.E.; Stallard, C.M. 1995. Rule-based approach to real-time distributed adaptive signal control, Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board 1683: 95-101.

 

Robertson, D.I.; Bretherton, R.D. 1991. Optimizing networks of traffic signals in real time-the SCOOT method, IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology 40(1): 11-15.

 

Robertson, D.I.; Bretherton, R.D. 1974. Optimum control of an intersection for any known sequence of vehicle arrivals. In Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC/IFIP/IFORS Symposium on Traffic Control and Transportation Systems, 3-17.

 

Vincent, R.; Peirce, J. 1988. Mova: Traffic responsive, self-optimising signal control for isolated intersections, Technical Report No.70. Transport Research Laboratory. 21 p.

 

Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L. 2010. Neuro-fuzzy reinforcement learning for adaptive intersection traffic signal control. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting (No. 10-0369).

 

Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Prevedouros, P.D. 2005. Signal control for oversaturated intersections using fuzzy logic, In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 84th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, [CD-rom].

 

Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Ye, Z. 2007. Development and Evaluation of a Multi-Agent Based Neuro-Fuzzy Arterial Traffic Signal Control System. Technical Report No. 473700-00092, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.