Article
SUPPLIER SELECTION IN PROCUREMENT LOGISTICS USING AHP-QFD AND ANP-QFD APPROACH
DOI: 10.7708/ijtte2022.12(1).03
12 / 1 / 35 - 48 Pages
Author(s)
Vukašin Pajić - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia -
Abstract
Procurement logistics stands out as one of the basic sectors in a logistics company. The other sectors in a company depend on procurement as it can cause downtime and delays that affect the entire company. In addition to the impact on the company itself, procurement can also have an impact on end-users, given that efficient procurement is one of the factors of competitiveness. One of the basic tasks of procurement logistics is the selection of suppliers. For this reason, the aim of this paper was to propose approaches based on AHP-QFD and ANP-QFD methodology in order to select suppliers. On that occasion, the evaluation of three suppliers was performed by applying eight criteria (price, product quality, on-time delivery, location, communication, reliability, flexibility, and reputation). The results of the application of the described methodologies also showed a different ranking of suppliers depending on the chosen methodology.
Number of downloads: 623
Keywords:
procurement logistics;
supplier selection;
AHP;
ANP;
QFD;
Acknowledgements:
This paper was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, through the project TR 36006.
References:
Akman, G.; Baynal, K. 2014. Logistics service provider selection through an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach, Journal of Industrial Engineering 4: 1–17.
Bansal, A.; Kumar, P.; Issar, S. 2013. 3PL selection: A multi-criteria decision making approach. In Proceedings of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management International Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 981–985.
Bevilacqua, M.; Ciarapica, F.; Giacchetta, G. 2006. A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 12: 14–27.
Bhattacharya, A.; Geraghty, J.; Young, P. 2010. Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment, Applied Soft Computing 10(4): 1013–1027.
Bottani, E.; Centobelli, P.; Murino, T.; Shekarian, E. 2018. A QFD-ANP Method for Supplier Selection with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks Considerations, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 17(3): 911-939.
Dai, J.; Blackhurst, J. 2012. A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: A sustainability perspective, International Journal of Production Research 50(19): 5474–5490.
Daim, T. U.; Udbye, A.; Balasubramanian, A. 2012. Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 24(1): 28–51.
Galankashi, M.R.; Chegeni, A.; Soleimanynanadegany, A.; Memari, A.; Anjomshoae, A.; Helmi, S.A.; Dargi, A. 2015. Prioritizing green supplier selection criteria using fuzzy analytical network process, Procedia CIRP 26: 689–694.
Ho, W.; Dey, P.; Lockstrom, M. 2011. Strategic sourcing: A combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing, Supply Chain Management: an International Journal 16(6): 446–461.
Hruška, R.; Pruša, P.; Babić, D. 2014. The use of AHP method for selection of supplier, Transport 29(2): 195-203.
Hsu, C.W.; Hu, A.H. 2009 Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process, Journal of Cleaner Production 17(2): 255-264.
Hwang, B. N.; Chen, T. T.; Lin, J. T. 2016. 3PL selection criteria in integrated circuit manufacturing industry in Taiwan, Supply Chain Management: an International Journal 21(1): 103–124.
Jamil, N.; Besar, R.; Sim, H. K. 2013. A Study of Multicriteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection in Automotive Industry, Journal of Industrial Engineering 1-22.
Jharkharia, S.; Shankar, R. 2007. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach, Omega 35(3): 274- 289.
Jothimani, D.; Sarmah, S. P. 2014. Supply chain performance measurement for third party logistics, Benchmarking: an International Journal 21(6): 944–963.
Kilic, H. S. 2013. An integrated approach for supplier selection in multi-item/multi-supplier environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(14): 7752-7763.
Kumar, P.; Singh, R.K. 2012. A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain, Journal of Modelling in Management 7(3): 287 – 303.
Kumar, R.; Singh, H.; Dureja, J. S. 2012. An approach to analyze logistic outsourcing problem in mediumscale organization by CFPR and VIKOR, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 23(7): 885–898.
Owida, A.M.; El-Kilany, K.S.; El-Sayed, A.E. 2010. In Proceedings Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing FAIM, California, 1-8.
Ozbek, A. 2015. Supplier Selection with Fuzzy TOPSIS, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 6(18): 114-125.
Palanisamy, P.; Zubar, H.A. 2013. Hybrid MCDM approach for vendor ranking, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 24(6): 905–928.
Polat, G.; Eray, E.; Bingol, B.N. 2017. An integrated fuzzy MCGDM approach for supplier selection problem, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 23(7): 926–942.
Rajesh, G.; Malliga, P. 2013. Supplier Selection Based on AHP QFD Methodology, Procedia Engineering 64: 1283-1292.
Sarkar, A.; Mohapatra, P.K.J. 2006. Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 12(3): 148-163.
Scott, J.; Ho, W.; Dey, P.; Talluri, S. 2015. A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments, International Journal of Production Economics 166: 226–237.
Shaw, K.; Shankar, R.; Yadav, S.S.; Thakur, L.S. 2012. Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain, Expert Systems with Applications 39: 8182–8192.
Shaw, K.; Shankar, R.; Yadav, S.S.; Thakur, L.S. 2013. Global supplier selection considering sustainability and carbon footprint issue: AHP multi-objective fuzzy linear programming approach, International Journal of Operational Research 17(2): 215–247.
Suraraksa, J.; Shin, K.S. 2019. Comparative Analysis of Facotrs for Supplier Selection and Monitoring: The Case of the Automotive Industry in Thailand, Sustainability 11: 981-994.
Taghizadeh, H.; Ershadi, M. 2013. Supplier's Selection in Supply Chain with Combined QFD and ANP Approaches, Research Journal of Recent Sciences 2(6): 66-76.
Ustun, O.; Demirtas, E.A. 2008. Multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection using achievement scalarizing functions, Computers & Industrial Engineering 54(4): 918-931.
Uygun, Ö.; Kaçamak, H.; Ayşim, G.; Şimşir, F. 2013. Supplier selection for automotive industry using multi-criteria decision making techniques, TOJSAT: the Online Journal of Science and Technology 3(4): 126-137.
Watt, D.J.; Kayis, B.; Willey, K. 2010. The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria, International Journal of Project Management 28(1): 51-60.
Wu, C.M.; Hsieh, C.L.; Chang, K.L. 2013. A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model for supplier selection, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 1–8.
Quoted IJTTE Works
There is no quoted studies.
Related Keywords