Volume List  / Volume 7 (1)



DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2017.7(1).08

7 / 1 / 108-116 Pages


Manjurali I. Balya - Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India -

Rakesh Kumar - Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India -


Public transit plays a vital role in economic development for access to the commuters/travelers to the city centers of metropolitan cities of developing countries. Accessibility of public transit system is a prime factor faced by developing countries due to the lack of feeder services. Therefore, an attempt to improve the feeder services (with different modes i.e. as walking, bicycle, mini bus) is major importance. The present research focuses on new innovative ideas of bicycle as feeder mode with its three services i.e. Exclusive Bicycle Lane, Bicycle operation in mixed traffic with park & ride facility and Bicycle Sharing Service for Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) corridor of Ahmedabad city. The multinomial logit model was applied to develop the models. The findings from the study revealed that as income increases the preference to BMT-PR service increases over BSS and EBL service for their commuting purpose. The observations of age distribution shows with increase in age, the choice of EBL service over BSS and decrease BMT-PR service over BSS. Gender wise distribution indicated that preference to EBL service as well as BMT-PR service are higher among male groups compared with female groups. The observation of the study revealed that with increase in travel time, the respondents are more preferring BSS service over both EBL service and BMT-PR service. Same as travel distance increases will be more preference of BSS over EBL service and BMT-PR service by commuters. The output of this research can be extremely useful to increase ridership of public transit by integrating feeder service.

Download Article

Number of downloads: 1278


The authors are thankful to all the respondents for giving their valuable responses during Home Interview Survey.


Advani, M.; Tiwari, G. 2006. Bicycle–as a feeder mode for bus service. In Proceedings of the Velo Mondial conference: third global cycling planning conference, 1-8.


Ashalatha, R.; Manju, V.; Zacharia, A.B. 2012. Mode choice behavior of commuters in Thiruvananthapuram city, Journal of Transportation Engineering 139(5): 494-502.


Balya M.I.; Kumar, R. 2016. Integration of Bicycle as Feeder Mode in Bus Rapid Transit System, Journal of Intelligent Transportation and Urban Planning 4(1): 35-44.


Brons, M.; Givoni, M.; Rietveld, P. 2009. Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 43(2): 136-149.


Chandra, S.; Bari, M.E.; Devarasetty, P.C.; Vadali, S. 2013. Accessibility evaluations of feeder transit services, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 52: 47-63.


Givoni, M.; Rietveld, P. 2007. The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel, Transport Policy 14(5): 357-365.


Hegger, R. 2007. Public transport and cycling: living apart or together?, Public Transport International 56(2): 38-41.


Krygsman, S.; Dijst, M.; Arentze, T. 2004. Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio, Transport Policy 11(3): 265-275.


Miskeen, A.; Manssour, A.; Mohamed Alhodairi, A.; Rahmat, R. 2013. Modeling of Intercity Transport Mode Choice Behavior in Libya: a Binary Logit Model for Business Trips by Private Car and Intercity Bus, Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 7(1): 302-311.


Pucher, J.; Buehler, R. 2009. Integrating bicycling and public transport in North America, Journal of Public Transportation 12(3): 79-104.


Replogle, M. 1992. Bicycles and cycle-rickshaws in Asian cities: issues and strategies, Transportation Research Record 1372: 76-84.

Quoted IJTTE Works

Related Keywords