Article
QUALITY CONTROL OF ARCHIVED INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DATA
DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2015.5(3).02
5 / 3 / 238-251 Pages
Author(s)
Khaled Hamad - Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates -
Abstract
Previous research has reported on the need to implement quality control programs for ITS data to address critical issues such as suspicious or erroneous data, nature and extent of missing data, and accuracy and comparability of ITS data to similar data sources. This paper summarizes the work completed to address quality control and completeness issues associated with a very large archived ITS data set composed of some 3.4 billion 20-second lane detector data records from San Antonio’s TransGuide. The paper includes a description of the quality control tests utilized, the results of the analysis conducted, and a discussion of ITS data completeness issues. An evaluation of temporal variations in the distribution of quality control flags showed that, in most cases, the highest concentration of flagged records occurred at night when traffic was light. Consequently, there was a higher chance for time intervals without vehicles which produced abnormal detector readings. Finally, the researchers evaluated the data completeness both at the aggregate level (by server) and a more detailed individual detector level. While the analysis described in this paper uses data from one jurisdiction (San Antonio, Texas), the methodology is sufficiently generic to enable implementation at other traffic management centers.
Number of downloads: 1559
Acknowledgements:
The work documented in this paper was funded by the Texas Department of Transportation. The authors appreciate the help and assistance provided by San Antonio’s TransGuide. The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute or the Texas Department of Transportation.
References:
Corey, J.; Lao, Y.; Wu, Y-J.; Wang, Y. 2011. Detection and Correction of Inductive Loop Detector Sensitivity Errors by Using Gaussian Mixture Models, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2256-15, 2256: 120-129.
Ishak, S. 2003. Fuzzy-Clustering Approach to Quantify Uncertainties of Freeway Detector Observations, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1856-02, 1856: 6-15.
Lin, D-Y.; Boyles, S.; Valsaraj, V.; Waller, S.T. 2012. Reliability Assessment for Traffic Data, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2012.655466, 35(3), 285-297.
Park, E.; Turner, S.; Spiegelman, C. 2003. Empirical Approaches to Outlier Detection in Intelligent Transportation Systems Data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1840-03, 1840: 21-30.
Saavedra, M.; Hellinga, B.; Casello, J. 2011. Automated Quality Assurance Methodology for Archived Transit Data from Automatic Vehicle Location and Passenger Counting Systems, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2256-16, 2256: 130-141.
Smith, B.L.; Venkatanarayana, R. 2007. A New Methodology for Customizing Quality Assessment Techniques for Traffic Data Archives, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1993-22, 1993: 165-174.
Turner, S.; Albert, L.; Gajewski, B.; Eisele, W. 2000. Archived Intelligent Transportation System Data Quality: Preliminary Analyses of San Antonio Transguide Data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1719-10, 1719: 77-84.
Turochy, R.E.; Smith, B.L. 2000. New Procedure for Detector Data Screening in Traffic Management Systems, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1727-16, 1727: 127-131.
Vanajakshi, L.; Rilett, L.R. 2004. Loop Detector Data Diagnostics Based on Conservation-of-Vehicles Principle, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1870-21, 1870: 162-169.
Vanajakshi, L.; Rilett, L. 2006. System Wide Data Quality Control of Inductance Loop Data Using Nonlinear Optimization, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2006)20:3(187), 20(3): 187-196.
Wall, Z.; Dailey, D. 2003. Algorithm for Detecting and Correcting Errors in Archived Traffic Data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1855-23, 1855: 183-190.
Weijermars, W.; Van Berkum, E. 2006. Detection of Invalid Loop Detector Data in Urban Areas, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1945-10, 1945: 82-88.
Widhalm, P.; Koller, H.; Ponweiser, W. 2011. Identifying Faulty Traffic Detectors with Floating Car Data. In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation System, June 29-July 1 2011, Vienna, 103-108.
Quoted IJTTE Works
There is no quoted studies.
Related Keywords
There is no related studies.