Article
AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE: THE EFFECTS OF THE MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING OF NON TIME DEPENDANT MAINTAINABILITY PARAMETERS
1 / 1 / 41 - 47 Pages
Author(s)
Olja ÄŒokorilo - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia -
Abstract
The aircraft maintenance is a complex and costly procedure (12-15% of total annual company costs). In this paper, aircraft maintainability was investigated by multi-attribute analyzing of non-time dependant parameters. With the aim of defining aircraft maintainability rank, the modified MAXMIN method was developed. The research was realized on the sample of five representative regional aircraft: Do328JET, CRJ-200, ERJ145, ATR42 and Fokker 50. The results obtained would help determine airline’s fleet.
Number of downloads: 5800
Acknowledgements:
This paper is based on the project TR36027: “Software development and national database for strategic management and development of transportation means and infrastructure in road, rail, air and inland waterways transport using the European transport network models†which is supported by the Ministry of science and technological development of Republic of Serbia (2011-2014).
References:
Abara, J., 1989. Applying integer linear programming to the fleet assignment problem. Interfaces 19(4): 20-28.
BADA, 2007. Base of Aircraft Data. Brussels: EUROCONTROL. 68 p.
Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division. 1994. Canadair Regional Jet Program Overview, Market Research & Product Strategy. Montreal: Bombardier Inc. 192 p.
Čokorilo, O.; Gvozdenović, S.; Mirosavljević, P.; Vasov, L. 2010. Multi attribute decision making: assessing the technological and operational parameters of an aircraft. Transport 25(4): 352-356. DOI: 10.3846/transport.2010.43.
FAA, 1991. Human factors in aviation maintenance - Phase one progress report, DOT/FAA/AM-91/16. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.
Fairchild Dornier, 1998. 328JET Program. Germany: Fairchild Dornier GmbH. 40 p.
Hane, C.A.; Barnhart, C.; Sigismindi, G. 1995. The fleet assignment problem: solving a large scale integer program. The Mathematical Programming Society 70: 211-231.
Kinnison, H. A. 2004. Aviation Maintenance Management. Europe: McGraw-Hill Education. Europe. 291 p.
Kraus, D.; Gramopadhye, A.K. 1999. Team training: role of computers in the aircraft maintenance environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 36(3): 635-654.
Lambert, M., 1991. Jane’s all the World’s Aircraft 1990-91. Virginia: Eighty-first edition. 807 p.
Lockheed., 1972. Maintainability and Reliability Features. California: Lockheed - California Company. 115 p.
Mamdani, E.H.; Gaines, B.R. 1981. Fuzzy Reasoning and its Applications. Academic Press, London: Academic Press. 381 p.
Saaty, T.L., 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15: 234-281.
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill , New York: McGraw-Hill. 287 p.
Sriram C.; Haghani A. 2003. An optimization model for aircraft maintenance scheduling and re-assignment. Transportation Research Part A 37: 29-48.
Subramanian, R.; Scheff Jr., R.P.; Quillinan, J. D. 1994. Coldstart: fleet assignment at Delta Airlines. Interfaces 24(1): 104-120.
Vasov, Lj.; Stojiljković, B.; Mitrović, Č. 2009. Reward level evaluation of parallel systems, Strojniski Vestnik, Journal of Mechanical Engineering 55(9): 542-548.
Zadeh, L.A. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning I, II, III. Inf.Sci. 8(1975): 199-257, 301-357; 9(1975): 43-80.
Quoted IJTTE Works
There is no quoted studies.
Related Keywords