Volume List  / Volume 5 (3)

Article

PEDESTRIAN RESPONSE TO ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE FOR MEDIUM SIZE CITY IN INDIA

DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2015.5(3).06


5 / 3 / 286-293 Pages

Author(s)

Pritikana Das - Centre for Transportation Systems, CTRANS, IIT Roorkee, India -

Manoranjan Parida - Department of Civil Engineering CTRANS, IIT Roorkee, India -

Vinod Kumar Katiyar - Mathematics Department, IIT Roorkee, India -


Abstract

Level of vehicular noise pollution is one of the major factors to choose pedestrian mode of transportation among other modes of transportation. Transportation systems and their related outcomes are responsible for ensuring safe travel options, including walking people of all ages and different abilities. This study will provide an opportunity to quantify the environmental impact in terms of noise level for future development and planning of pedestrian infrastructure in India. It will also help in modal shifting towards walking, improvements in energy efficiency, and the impact of specific contaminants on health. Exposure of high noise level can cause annoyance and severe stress on auditory and nervous system of pedestrians. Most of the Indian cities have noise level above than acceptable limits because of rapid urbanization with increasing number of vehicular traffic. The objective of this study is to study response of pedestrians towards noise pollution in Roorkee at different locations based on different land use. Roorkee is a medium size city with a population of 2.73 lakhs (Roorkee Metropolitan areas, 2011 census), situated in Uttarakhand, India. It is a city with large number of educational institutions and sizable numbers of student population. Noise level study has been carried out at ten locations on NH-58 near Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. Noise data was collected at an interval of 30 seconds. Design implications for future improvement of pedestrian infrastructure have been presented in this paper considering traffic noise as an environmental factor. It is expected that the study outcome shall be useful in understanding positive effect of low traffic noise encouraging increased usage of pedestrian facilities within urban transport network.


Download Article

Number of downloads: 1943


References:

Bendtsen, H. 1999. The Nordic prediction method for road traffic noise, Science of the Total Environment. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00216-8, 235(1-3): 331-338.

 

Brown, A.; Lam, K. 1987. Urban noise surveys, Applied Acoustics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-682X(87)90081-8, 20(1): 23-39.

 

Caussy, D.; Kumar, P.; Than Sein, U. 2003. Health impact assessment needs in south-east Asian countries, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81(6): 439-443.

 

Higgins, I.T.T. 1984. Air pollution and lung cancer: diesel exhaust, coal combustion, Preventive Medicine. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(84)90052-5, 13(2): 207-218.

 

Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidence, FHWA-HEP-10-025. 2011. Available from Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/regulations_and_guidance/analysis_and_abatement_guidance/revguidance.pdf.

 

Kumar, A.; Jain, R.B.; Khanna, P.; Goel, M.K. 2011. Health Impact Assessment In India: Need of The Hour, Internet Journal of Third World Medicine, 9(2).

 

Langdon, F.J.; Scholes, W. 1968. The Traffic Noise Index: A Method of Controlling Noise Nuisance. 20 p.

 

Marathe, P. 2012. Traffic Noise Pollution, IJED, 9(1): 63-68.

 

Mishra, R.K.; Rangnekar, S.; Parida, M. 2008. Survey on Noise Pollution and Its Management, Journal of the IPHE, India, 9(4): 30-34.

 

Mishra, R.K.; Parida, M.; Rangnekar, S. 2010. Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise along bus rapid transit system corridor, International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 7(4): 737-750.

 

Nelson, J.P. 1982. Highway noise and property values: a survey of recent evidence, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 16(2): 117-138.

 

Pathak, V.; Tripathi, B.D.; Mishra, V.K. 2008. Evaluation of traffic noise pollution and attitudes of exposed individuals in working place, Atmospheric Environment. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.070, 42(16): 3892-3898.

 

Rahmani, S.; Mousavi, S.M.; Kamali, M.J. 2011. Modeling of road-traffic noise with the use of genetic algorithm, Applied Soft Computing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.01.022, 11(1): 1008-1013.

 

Robinson, D. 1971. Towards a unified system of noise assessment, Journal of Sound and Vibration. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(71)90367-1, 14(3): 279-298.

 

Schell, L.M.; Gallo, M.V.; Denham, M.; Ravenscroft, J. 2006. Effects of pollution on human growth and development: an introduction, Journal of Physiological Anthropology. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.25.103, 25(1): 103-112.

 

Schmidt, C.W. 2005. Noise that Annoys: Regulating Unwanted Sound, Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(1): 138-143.

 

Sharma, A.; Vijay, R.; Sandar, V.K.; Sohony, R.A.; Gupta, A. 2010. Development of noise simulation model for stationary and mobile sources: A GIS-based approach, Environmental Modeling & Assessment. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-009-9197-3, 15(3): 189-197.

 

Singh, N.; Davar, S. 2004. Noise pollution-sources, effects and control, Journal of Human Ecology, 16(3): 181-187.

 

Subramani, T.; Kavitha, M.; Sivaraj, K. 2012. Modelling of Traffic Noise Pollution, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(3): 3175-3182.

 

The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) RULES. 2000. Available from Internet: http://www.lawsindia.com/Industrial%20Law/K092.htm.

 

Wolf, S.; White, A.; Stanley, N. 2002. Principles of Environmental Law. 3rd Ed, Cavandish Publishing Limited, Great Britain, 293-299.


Quoted IJTTE Works



Related Keywords