Volume List  / Volume 3 (4)



DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2013.3(4).03

3 / 4 / 377-396 Pages


Milena Dževerdanović-Pejović - Faculty of Maritime Studies, Kotor, University of Montenegro -


Discourse analysis of real examples of internal and external communication at sea represents a real challenge for linguists. Research in this field is at its very beginning and was partially presented in the final report of the MARCOM project (1999). The main reason for this is the scarcity of the available VHF material and on-board verbal recordings. This paper explored to what extent the rules for radio conversation are applied in the segments of real verbal communication between ships at sea, especially with regard to application of the Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP), set by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2001. Using knowledge of conversation analysis as a peculiar branch of discourse analysis and intercultural communication theories dealing with multi-cultural crewing issues, the special emphasis was given to the formal/informal, official/unofficial and standardized/non-standardized discourse dichotomies.

Download Article

Number of downloads: 9739


Austin, J. 1994. Kako delovati rečima (in Serbian). Novi Sad: Matica srpska.


Bocanegra-Valle, A. 2010. Global markets, global challenges: The position of Maritime English in today’s shipping Industry. In: Professional English in the European context. The EHEA Challenge, Peter Lang, 151-180.


Gotti, M. 2008. Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.


Hatch, E. 1992. Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Heritage, J. 2001. Goffman, Garfinkel and Conversation Analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & J.S. Yates (eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: SAGE Publications, 47-57.


IMO Standard Maritime Communication Phrases. Resolution A.918 (22), 29 November 2001. London: International Maritime Organization.


Lazaraton, A. 2009. Discourse Analysis. In: J. Heigham and R.A. Croker (eds.). A Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 201-226.


MARCOM project. 1999. The Impact of Multicultural and Multilingual Crews on Maritime Communication Final Report- Volume 1. Brussels: Transport RTD Programme.


MAIB (Marine Accident Investigation Branch). 2009. Investigation Report Maersk Kendal. Available from Internet: http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/investigation_reports/2010/maersk_kendal.cfm.


NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2009. M/V Cosco Busan Bridge Allision, San Francisco, California. Available from Internet: http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2009/MAR0901.pdf.


NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 1995. Grounding of the passenger ship Royal Majesty. Available from Internet: http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/m/profile/adegani/Grounding%20of%20the%20Royal%20Majesty.pdf.


Pritchard, B. 2003. Maritime Communications and IMO SMCP 2001 (draft version). Available from Internet: http://www.pfri.uniri.hr/~bopri/documents/MaritimeCommunicationsandSMCP_001.pdf.


Pyne, R.; Koester, T. 2005. Methods and means of analysis of crew communication in the maritime domain, The Archives of Transport, 17(3-4): 1-16. Available from Internet: http://general.marine-files.net/upload/Methods and Means for Analysis of Crew Communication in maritime domain.pdf.


Savić, S. 1998. Diskurs Analiza (in Serbian). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.


Schegloff, E.A. 1992. To Searle on conversation. In: H. Parret and J. Verschueren (eds.) Searle on Conversation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 113-28.


The Standard Marine Navigational Vocabulary (SMNV). 1987. London: International Maritime Organization.


Wierzbicka, A. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Wooffitt, R. 2005. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: Sage Publications Ltd. 29-32.

Quoted IJTTE Works

Related Keywords